The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Do you believe in God? Religion vs Science
in Religion
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 7%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I personally believe in science.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
You had some interesting debates and I hope things are well.
I also believe in higher power, but just not sure what it is. We don't understand so many things, so for us to say with absolute certainty that we know exactly how things started is arogant. I think there is a higher form of energy that holds things together, and what I think is most important is that we believe in something, and that something drives us to do the right thing. Whether it's fear of going to hell, or a desire of getting to heaven..that is one of the glues holding societies together and avoid anarchy.
I dont argue against the big bang, that maybe part of that higher power plan too. There is sufficient evidence that something like Big Bang did happen.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 7%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
It is all based on personal belief.
Science has demonstrated substantial theory supporting Big Bang. As you earlier pointed out it will be too arogant for us to understand exactly what happened, but I still find Big Bang theory more compelling.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes I believe that God exists but I do not believe He is an entity of good or evil, these are human concepts. I think he created the universe for his own amusement like a computer game. Sometimes he helps or hurts some character or other out of curiosity, to see what will happen
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 70%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
A lot of horrible things in this world get done for something greater then ourselves. Humans have invented thousands of gods over thousands of years and all have become myths when belief in them stopped. The only thing needed for gods to be true is belief. One need not own beliefs of any kind to establish scientific facts, observe and enjoy nature, or live a productive, moral, and useful life.
Because of it's certainty religious faith is both arrogant and ignorant. Far from being arrogant the scientific method is one of humility. It acknowledges the limits of our current knowledge. It doesn't provide explanations or answers from a position of ignorance, but investigates the unknown in an attempt to reach understanding based on empirical evidence. Surely it is the superstitious or religious approach which claims to know the answers without any evidence except "faith" that is the arrogant approach.
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
And to contest some of the other statements concerning Science, there hasn't been any proof that God doesn't exist. I concede that the existence of God cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt, but by definition, Science cannot disprove God and also cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that the origins of the Earth don't involve God. This is the great thing about theories, they're subject to change and therefor cannot ever be facts. Hence the "Theory of Evolution", "Big Bang Theory"...ect, none of them are facts and none of them can be proven Scientifically. And in regards to Laws of Science, even the Laws of Science can be and have been changed and are therefor not concrete. Newton's Laws allegedly applied to all objects on the Earth, with the discovery of Sub-Atomic Particles (Which do not respect Newton's Laws) the well established first, second and third laws had to be changed to encompass previously undiscovered information. This is where we got Quantum Physics and Quantum Mechanics...so not even Scientific Laws can be facts.
Lastly,
1. The Scientific Method is as follows: A method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
2. Science is the study of the Physical and Natural world through observation and experiment.
3. Supernatural means: (of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature.
4. The underlying goal of Science is not to make predictions, it is to develop an understanding of the mechanisms underlying the operation of the natural world.
Source: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/supernatural
Source: http://sciencecouncil.org/about-us/our-definition-of-science/
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/scientific_method
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/03/15/science-and-unobservable-things/#.WQ9_89y1uUk
So from our Scientific community we can logically deduce that:
A. Science cannot apply to the supernatural world, only the physical and Natural.
B. The Supernatural by definition excludes Scientific understanding and therefor nothing Scientific can explain it.
C. Since no one can observe what happened during the creation of life, the Scientific Method cannot be executed in creating a theory or hypothesis concerning how it happened.
D. Since the creation of life was not observed, cannot be observed, and cannot be tested then no experiment can be executed to further the theory of how it occurred.
Simply put, Scientists have been tossing aside their very own code and systems for decades while trying to explain the origins of life. Why? Because you cannot attempt to explain the origin of life without conceding that it cannot be observed, tested or experimented.
Scientist - Gentlemen, we have a theory on the origins of life!
Scientific Community - Did you find a way to observe what happened?
Scientist - No, but we have another theory on how to determine what would have been observed had we been there.
Scientific Community - Did you test this theory?
Scientist - No but there's no way to test it since we can't possibly know the controls, variables or measurements during the event, so we have a theory for that too.
Scientific Community - Well did you at least experiment with this to try to recreate a comparable model?
Scientist - No but everyone else who's tried to create an experiment for this has failed and we have a theory for that too.
Scientific Community - So you didn't observe it, you can't test it and you can't experiment to make any real determination in regards to empirical facts?
Scientist - If you wanted to put it that way, yes.
Scientific Community - Well it sounds good to us! Let's get this published! By next year they'll be teaching this in Public School!
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.74  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
It will be fascinating to see what happens once/if science can actually create new life forms and replicate some of the facts. Faith of many may get questioned
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 33%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Noah's Ark. Real in the bible not a mythical story. Never been found and there's a lot of mistakes there a huge amount of mistakes in this story. And Saying Because god wanted it or something is not a legitimate excuse.
The ark is 450 × 75 × 45 ft and the journey was 1 year long. Here are the mistakes i have caught feel free to add more.
No meat could be preserved for a year.
Animals with Long gestational period could not survive.
Animals from Australia could not have crossed to the ark or back and no fossils of Australian animals found in a crossing/
Ants cannot survive with two ants. You would need a Colony.
Seeds could not survive underwater neither could plants. And nobody could really collect them
There are certain bugs that only feed on the eggs of other bugs. How could either survive since one doesn't have food one doesn't have eggs
Genetic bottle neck. No genetic diversity, everything would be SOOOO horribly inbred.
How could you keep food fresh.
Where would you get fresh water
If it flooded continents, saltwater and freshwater animals would mix and not survive
Underwater plants couldn't survive since there would be too much water and sun couldnt get though messing up the whole underwater ecosystem
how Could bugs with week long life spans survive
Dolania americana females have a 5 minute life span, how could they survive
How would you get that much wood in the middle east
How did Noah build that boat of that size with no prior knowledge, professional shipbuilders at the time couldn't make one nearly as big with it having problems,
How did some animals keep instincts if there just feed.
How would untrained people get poop out of a dangerous animals pen
How would noah choose which animals survive out of that species, like i want those two llamas, the rest can just die.
Other civilization at the time have no record of this event/
No rock patterns showing wearing from so much water
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 20%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 20%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 55%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
i.e God i.e Aliens and so on so forth.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 36%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 67%  
  Learn More About Debra
Some even trees and the sun. If you really want a religion, I think you should look for a monotheistic one. Because if there is more than one god, Then god isn't all powerful. I chose islam, Quite interesting numerical miracles.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 72%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 26%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.7  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 77%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
I honestly don't know much about the scientific method and I don't claim to either. How is this part of the debate and was that an appeal to authority?
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 97%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
While I concede that the Scientific Method may have been created by a theist, it is none-the-less the accepted method by the Scientific Community as a whole for the fundamental principles of Science. This is the part of science that I happen to love, there is some wiggle room but for the most part it's set firmly in methodology, rules and standards...far from the Religious community which can't seem to agree on much of anything, much less a standard of practice.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why would a theist make something that isn't compatible with his religion? And god doesn't have to be in the realm of the super natural alone, Why not the realm of the un seen? We can't see gravity as it is in the realm of the un seen, But it is there. Science and religion can easily go together, And you don't really have to twist the words of either to do so.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
To answer your question:
Answer: Science is the study of the natural world...plain and simple. The ideology behind a supremely powerful being who can defy all the laws of the natural world is by definition "Supernatural" and therefor stands distinctly separated from Science and beyond Scientific understanding. So essentially, whoever created the Scientific Method (Whoever you believe made the most contributions to its establishment) didn't create a Religious incompatibility but merely made it so that one could not be used in conjunction with the other as they are in different realms.
And secondly:
Answer: I've found no reference to the "Realm of the unseen" that isn't a supernatural reference. Granted you cannot see gravity but that doesn't make it supernatural, this is a faulty comparison because Gravity, while it cannot be observed directly (Similar to air), the effect of Gravity can be observed and experienced. You can test gravity, you can formulate hypotheses and then experiment to verify its existential nature.
In this, I'm afraid that we may have to agree to disagree, God or "A God" is a supernatural being by definition no matter how hard anyone wants it to be otherwise. I don't believe anyone from the Scientific Community would disagree either. Not to say that Science cannot be applied to what's in front of us that may be the result of something Supernatural...I think this is where Science and Religion meet very well.
And I agree that no twisting of words is required to bring Science and Religion together however, this doesn't make it so that anyone can use Science to formulate theories regarding God. To date I actually haven't seen any scientific study aimed at theorizing God at all, most Science regarding the supernatural is used in an attempt to prove or disprove it all-together...never to explain the existence of God...but that might have something to do with Science and the Supernatural being separated by definition.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
If a religion is right, We can see the effects of it. For example ; Islam.
Every year [mandatory] every single muslim must pay 2% of his wealth to the poor. The poor can see the effect of this. Or the theists that live a more meaningful life because they believe in god. They see the effect on their own life. And i guess i agree god is a supernatural being. May i ask what religion you are a part of?
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
If a religion is right, We can see the effects of it. For example ; Islam.
Every year [mandatory] every single muslim must pay 2% of his wealth to the poor. The poor can see the effect of this. Or the theists that live a more meaningful life because they believe in god. They see the effect on their own life. And i guess i agree god is a supernatural being. May i ask what religion you are a part of?
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Nice debate, and I agree that you can observe the effects of the choices people make in their life. Religion is a belief system, without the belief then the Religion has no power. Now I'm not saying that God or Allah has no power, but the Religion itself is a belief that exists in our minds and through our actions. Practicing Muslims as you say, choose to pay a portion of their wealth to the poor, the poor in turn choose to accept it. The Religion alone and itself did not do anything, the faithful did.
Now I agree that practicing a religion can give you a more meaningful life and can bring you peace that you might not know otherwise. I suppose it depends on the person as not everyone who encounters Religion can say it was positive and neither can everyone say it was negative.
And I'm Non-Denominational Christian. Essentially I believe that if God were to come to Earth (Which I don't believe he ever would), he would be disappointed and ashamed that we all split and segregated ourselves into different religions, each chastising the other for what we perceived as "The wrong way to worship" or "The wrong way to believe". I don't believe that he would be proud of what we've done with our practices.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Where me and you go different ways, Is on the ''God is jesus'' topic.
We believe jesus was one of the mightiest messengers of allah. But not god. Also, In islam people like you would go to heaven. Actually even the jews. And any pious person who believes in god. Some muslims will even go to hell i.e Saddam Al Hussein. Bashar Al Assad.
While many christians will go to heaven, And many to hell. The only people who don't have a place in jannah/heaven in islam are the atheists and maybe agnostics.
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 49%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
Religion is theory. Science is simply a process we use to verify theories. As yet we have not been able to verify the existence of a god.
Religion v Science? There is no conflict between religion and science. There is only conflict between senseless human beings.
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
To your statement of
Religion is faith based belief. Likewise, a vast majority of Scientific Theory requires a large leap of faith as well, as the majority of theories cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt and any Scientist will attest to this.
Science is more of a philosophy, the "Scientific Method" however is more along the lines of what verifies a theory. And even if a theory is verified through experiment...this does not make it a fact or truth. And as to your attesting that we have not been able to verify the existence of God...I would simply say what I have said before.
"Scientists will all agree that that idea of "God" is Supernatural and Science is the study of the natural and physical world". Therefor Science cannot ever be used to prove or disprove the existence of God because the realm of the supernatural specifically excludes scientific understanding by definition. By the actual meaning of the word...you cannot...ever...use science to effectively study, theorize, verify or refute the existence of anything in the realm of the supernatural.
http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=52402
http://blog.drwile.com/science-cant-prove-anything/
http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~heuveb/teaching/CriticalThinking/Web/Presentations/Science.pdf
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.1  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
Feel free to challenge me to this and attempt to prove me wrong and try to prove god exists. Who knows, maybe you will come up with something original.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 56%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
There you go.
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.34  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra